ENT503_-_SP_2025_-_H1_-_RFE_3331.webp
T

ENT503_-_SP_2025_-_H1_-_RFE_3331.webp

Reading Fill Blank
Questions
4567
Reading 1/2:
Read the following passage and type the letter representing your answer from the choices given.
☐ A
☐ D
Meanwhile, scientists are also struggling with the best way to measure the concept. As a marker of creativity, researchers often measure divergent thinking-the ability to generate a lot of
possible solutions to a problem or question. The standard test of divergent thinking came from Guilford himself. Known as the alternate-uses test, the task asks participants to come up with
"novel" uses for a common object such as a brick. But measures of divergent thinking haven't been found to correlate well with real-world creativity.
Does coming up with new uses for a brick imply a person will be good at abstract art or composing music or devising new methods for studying the brain? "It strikes me as using way too
broad a brush." Seli said. "I don't think we measure creativity in the standard way that people think about creativity. As researchers, we need to be very clear about what we mean.
One way to do that may be to move away from defining creativity based on a person's creative output and focus instead on what's going on in the brain, said Adam Green, PhD, a cognitive
neuroscientist at Georgetown University and founder of the Society for the Neuroscience of Creativity. "The standard definition, that creativity is novel and useful, is a description of a
product." he noted. "By looking inward, we can see the process in action and start to identify the characteristics of creative thought. Neuroimaging is helping to shift the focus from creative
product to creative process."
Next Question
Next Reading
That process seems to involve the coupling of disparate brain regions. Specifically, creativity often involves coordination between the cognitive control network, which is involved in executive
functions such as planning and problem-solving, and the default mode network, which is most active during mind-wandering or daydreaming (Beaty. R. E., et al., Cerebral Cortex. Vol. 31. No.
10, 2021). The cooperation of those networks may be a unique feature of creativity. Green said. "These two systems are usually antagonistic. They rarely work together, but creativity seems
to be one instance where they do."
Green has also found evidence that an area called the frontopolar cortex, in the brain's frontal lobes, is associated with creative thinking. And stimulating the area seems to boost creative
abilities. He and his colleagues used transcranial direct current stimulation (TDCS) to stimulate the frontopolar cortex of participants as they tried to come up with novel analogies. Stimulating
the area led participants to make analogies that were more semantically distant from one another-in other words, more creative (Cerebral Cortex, Vol. 27, No. 4. 2017).
F
Green's work suggests that targeting specific areas in the brain, either with neuromodulation or cognitive interventions, could enhance creativity. Yet no one is suggesting that a single brain
region, or even a single neural network, is responsible for creative thought. "Creativity is not one system but many different mechanisms that, under ideal circumstances, work together in a
seamless way." Kounios said.
G
In search of the eureka moment. Creativity looks different from person to person. And even within one brain, there are different routes to a creative spark, Kounios explained. One involves
what cognitive scientists call "System 1" (also called "Type 1") processes: quick, unconscious thoughts-"Aha!" moments-that burst into consciousness. A second route involves "System 2"
processes: thinking that is slow, deliberate, and conscious. "Creativity can use one or the other or a combination of the two." he said. "You might use Type 1 thinking to generate ideas and
Type 2 to critique and refine them."
H
They found that for highly experienced musicians, the mechanisms used to generate creative ideas were largely automatic and unconscious, and they came from the left posterior part of the
brain. Less-experienced pianists drew on more analytical, deliberative brain processes in the right frontal region to devise creative melodies, as Kounios and colleagues described in a
special issue of Neurolmage on the neuroscience of creativity (Vol. 213. 2020). "It seems there are at least two pathways to get from where you are to a creative idea." he said.
1) Who remarked that there are various paths leading to a creative spark even within a single brain?
A. Guilford
B. Kounios
C Green
Chưa có bình luận nào.

Thông tin

Category
ENT503
Thêm bởi
Thanh Vân
Ngày thêm
Lượt xem
725
Lượt bình luận
0
Rating
0.00 star(s) 0 đánh giá

Share this media

Back
Bên trên Bottom