-
Cùng tham gia nhóm của FuOverflow trên Facebook https://www.facebook.com/groups/nvh2fuoverflow
Request 1: Project Details
Project Name: Annual Charity Gala for Education
Purpose: To raise funds for underprivileged children’s education by organizing a memorable and high-profile charity gala.
Objectives:
- Raise $200,000 for the cause.
- Promote awareness about the importance of education for all.
- Build strong community and stakeholder engagement.
Customer and Sponsor:
- Primary Customer: A local non-governmental organization focused on children’s education.
- Sponsor: A consortium of corporate partners, local businesses, and humanitarians.
Success Criteria:
- Budgetary Goal: Achieving or exceeding the $200,000 fundraising target.
- Attendance: Attracting at least 300 guests, including corporate representatives, media, and influencers.
- Quality: Ensuring a consistent, engaging, and professionally executed event, reflected in post-event feedback surveys with a minimum satisfaction score of 90%.
- Awareness: Generating at least 50 media mentions and significant social media buzz during and post-event.
Project Constraints:
- Cost: Strict budget cap of $150,000 for organizing the event.
- Resources: Limited availability of professional event planning staff; dependence on volunteers and part-time workers.
- Quality: High expectations from sponsors and attendees, requiring top-tier execution.
Request 2: Current organizational Type: The project likely uses a functional organization where event management tasks are assigned to specialized departments (e.g., marketing for promotions, finance for budgeting).
Recommended Organizational Type: A matrix organization (preferably a strong matrix) should be applied for this project.
Reasons:
- Cross-functional collaboration: A matrix structure allows masters from different areas (marketing, logistics, finance) to work together, improving coordination and creativity.
- Clear authority: A project manager in a strong matrix ensures responsibility and prioritization of event goals over functional departmental priorities.
- Flexibility: The matrix allows resource optimization by drawing skill from multiple departments without overburdening one team.
Project Name: Annual Charity Gala for Education
Purpose: To raise funds for underprivileged children’s education by organizing a memorable and high-profile charity gala.
Objectives:
- Raise $200,000 for the cause.
- Promote awareness about the importance of education for all.
- Build strong community and stakeholder engagement.
Customer and Sponsor:
- Primary Customer: A local non-governmental organization focused on children’s education.
- Sponsor: A consortium of corporate partners, local businesses, and humanitarians.
Success Criteria:
- Budgetary Goal: Achieving or exceeding the $200,000 fundraising target.
- Attendance: Attracting at least 300 guests, including corporate representatives, media, and influencers.
- Quality: Ensuring a consistent, engaging, and professionally executed event, reflected in post-event feedback surveys with a minimum satisfaction score of 90%.
- Awareness: Generating at least 50 media mentions and significant social media buzz during and post-event.
Project Constraints:
- Cost: Strict budget cap of $150,000 for organizing the event.
- Resources: Limited availability of professional event planning staff; dependence on volunteers and part-time workers.
- Quality: High expectations from sponsors and attendees, requiring top-tier execution.
Request 2: Current organizational Type: The project likely uses a functional organization where event management tasks are assigned to specialized departments (e.g., marketing for promotions, finance for budgeting).
Recommended Organizational Type: A matrix organization (preferably a strong matrix) should be applied for this project.
Reasons:
- Cross-functional collaboration: A matrix structure allows masters from different areas (marketing, logistics, finance) to work together, improving coordination and creativity.
- Clear authority: A project manager in a strong matrix ensures responsibility and prioritization of event goals over functional departmental priorities.
- Flexibility: The matrix allows resource optimization by drawing skill from multiple departments without overburdening one team.
Request 3:
Risk 1: Poor Ticket Sales
- Probability: High (70%)
- Impact: High (Budgetary shortage jeopardizing success criteria).
Response Plan:
+ Mitigation: Launch an aggressive early-bird ticket campaign and use social media influencers to promote ticket sales.
+ Contingency: Reduce non-critical consumptions (e.g., decor costs) if sales remain below target.
Risk 2: Venue or Logistics Issues
- Probability: Medium (50%)
- Impact: High (Delays, cancellation, or compromised event quality).
Response Plan:
+ Mitigation: Have backup venues identified and arrange flexible contracts with vendors.
+ Contingency: Engage an experienced logistics coordinator and prepare for emergency adjustments.
Risk 3: Sponsor Withdrawal
- Probability: Low (30%)
- Impact: High (Significant budget impact).
Response Plan:
+ Mitigation: Secure multiple smaller sponsors to diversify funding sources.
+ Contingency: Prepare a secondary budget plan prioritizing critical elements.
Scoring System:
Probability: High (70%+), Medium (40-69%), Low (<40%).
Impact: High (Critical financial/operational loss), Medium (Moderate disruption), Low (Minor inconvenience).
Request 4:
Path 1: Start -> A -> B -> C -> G -> End
Duration: 4 + 3 + 2 + 6 = 15 weeks
Path 2: Start -> D -> B -> C -> G -> End
Duration: 5 + 3 + 2 + 6 = 16 weeks
Path 3: Start -> D -> E -> F -> G -> End
Duration: 5 + 4 + 2 + 6 = 17 weeks
Path 4: Start -> D -> H -> I -> End
Duration: 5 + 5 + 9 = 19 weeks
The critical path is the longest path, as it determines the minimum time required to complete the project.
Critical Path: Path 4 (Start -> D -> H -> I -> End) with a duration of 19 weeks.
Solutions to Shorten the Schedule by 3 Weeks
To reduce the schedule from 19 weeks to 16 weeks, we must focus on activities along the critical path (D, H, I). Below are three potential solutions:
- Reduce Activity Duration for "I" (H -> I):
+ Current Duration: 9 weeks
+ Proposed Change: Reduce by 3 weeks through crashing (e.g., adding more resources or parallelizing tasks where possible).
+ Impact: Critical path is reduced to 16 weeks.
- Reduce Activity Duration for "H" (D -> H):
+ Current Duration: 5 weeks
+ Proposed Change: Reduce by 2 weeks (e.g., by allocating additional resources) and reduce "I" by 1 week.
+ Impact: Critical path is reduced to 16 weeks.
- Fast-Track Activities "H" and "I":
+ Approach: Overlap tasks "H" and "I" partially to save 3 weeks. For example: Start "I" after 3 weeks of "H" instead of waiting for "H" to finish.
+ Impact: Critical path is reduced to 16 weeks without altering individual task durations.
Request 5: EV = PV + CV = 125,000 − 10,000 = 115,000
Cost Performance Index (CPI): CPI = EV / AC = 115000 / 120000 = 0.96
Schedule Performance Index (SPI): SPI = EV / PV = 115000 / 125000 = 0.92
Comments on Current Status:
- Schedule: Behind schedule (SPI < 1), indicating that less work has been completed than planned.
- Cost: Over budget (CPI < 1), meaning the project is spending more than expected for the achieved value.
Forecast: If current trends continue, the project will struggle to meet deadlines and exceed its budget.
Recommended Adjustments:
- Cost Control: Review and eliminate non-essential costs to improve CPI.
- Schedule Catch-up: Allocate additional resources or extend working hours to accelerate progress.
- Risk Management: Focus on mitigating potential high-probability risks like ticket sales and scene issues to prevent further disruptions.
Risk 1: Poor Ticket Sales
- Probability: High (70%)
- Impact: High (Budgetary shortage jeopardizing success criteria).
Response Plan:
+ Mitigation: Launch an aggressive early-bird ticket campaign and use social media influencers to promote ticket sales.
+ Contingency: Reduce non-critical consumptions (e.g., decor costs) if sales remain below target.
Risk 2: Venue or Logistics Issues
- Probability: Medium (50%)
- Impact: High (Delays, cancellation, or compromised event quality).
Response Plan:
+ Mitigation: Have backup venues identified and arrange flexible contracts with vendors.
+ Contingency: Engage an experienced logistics coordinator and prepare for emergency adjustments.
Risk 3: Sponsor Withdrawal
- Probability: Low (30%)
- Impact: High (Significant budget impact).
Response Plan:
+ Mitigation: Secure multiple smaller sponsors to diversify funding sources.
+ Contingency: Prepare a secondary budget plan prioritizing critical elements.
Scoring System:
Probability: High (70%+), Medium (40-69%), Low (<40%).
Impact: High (Critical financial/operational loss), Medium (Moderate disruption), Low (Minor inconvenience).
Request 4:
Path 1: Start -> A -> B -> C -> G -> End
Duration: 4 + 3 + 2 + 6 = 15 weeks
Path 2: Start -> D -> B -> C -> G -> End
Duration: 5 + 3 + 2 + 6 = 16 weeks
Path 3: Start -> D -> E -> F -> G -> End
Duration: 5 + 4 + 2 + 6 = 17 weeks
Path 4: Start -> D -> H -> I -> End
Duration: 5 + 5 + 9 = 19 weeks
The critical path is the longest path, as it determines the minimum time required to complete the project.
Critical Path: Path 4 (Start -> D -> H -> I -> End) with a duration of 19 weeks.
Solutions to Shorten the Schedule by 3 Weeks
To reduce the schedule from 19 weeks to 16 weeks, we must focus on activities along the critical path (D, H, I). Below are three potential solutions:
- Reduce Activity Duration for "I" (H -> I):
+ Current Duration: 9 weeks
+ Proposed Change: Reduce by 3 weeks through crashing (e.g., adding more resources or parallelizing tasks where possible).
+ Impact: Critical path is reduced to 16 weeks.
- Reduce Activity Duration for "H" (D -> H):
+ Current Duration: 5 weeks
+ Proposed Change: Reduce by 2 weeks (e.g., by allocating additional resources) and reduce "I" by 1 week.
+ Impact: Critical path is reduced to 16 weeks.
- Fast-Track Activities "H" and "I":
+ Approach: Overlap tasks "H" and "I" partially to save 3 weeks. For example: Start "I" after 3 weeks of "H" instead of waiting for "H" to finish.
+ Impact: Critical path is reduced to 16 weeks without altering individual task durations.
Request 5: EV = PV + CV = 125,000 − 10,000 = 115,000
Cost Performance Index (CPI): CPI = EV / AC = 115000 / 120000 = 0.96
Schedule Performance Index (SPI): SPI = EV / PV = 115000 / 125000 = 0.92
Comments on Current Status:
- Schedule: Behind schedule (SPI < 1), indicating that less work has been completed than planned.
- Cost: Over budget (CPI < 1), meaning the project is spending more than expected for the achieved value.
Forecast: If current trends continue, the project will struggle to meet deadlines and exceed its budget.
Recommended Adjustments:
- Cost Control: Review and eliminate non-essential costs to improve CPI.
- Schedule Catch-up: Allocate additional resources or extend working hours to accelerate progress.
- Risk Management: Focus on mitigating potential high-probability risks like ticket sales and scene issues to prevent further disruptions.
EV = PV + CV???
sai đó, hồi đó làm vội
cho mình hỏi là PMG201c đề tài là chuẩn bị trước à? xem đề toàn thấy yêu cầu chứ ko thấy yêu cầu đề tài
minh tu chon de tai r lam do
thi trên EOS sao mà lật tài liệu word được bạn
Similar threads
Đề Thi PE
PMG201c - SU 2024 - PE2
Đề Thi PE
PMG201c - PE2 - SP 2024
Đề Thi PE
PMG201c - FA 2024 - PE1